"genus irritable": Another try with a #Watercolor #portrait...I'm not sure if I will keep working on it, or leave it as is. I love the spontaneous look of it and don't want to lose that...at the same time the model is much more beautiful than I was able to capture....

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Another try with a #Watercolor #portrait...I'm not sure if I will keep working on it, or leave it as is. I love the spontaneous look of it and don't want to lose that...at the same time the model is much more beautiful than I was able to capture....

No comments:

Post a Comment

". . . That poets (using the word comprehensively, as including artists in general) are a genus irritable, is well understood. . . An artist is an artist only by dint of his exquisite sense of Beauty — a sense affording him rapturous enjoyment, but at the same time implying or involving, an equally exquisite sense of Deformity, of disproportion. Thus a wrong — an injustice — done a poet who is really a poet, excites him to a degree which, to ordinary apprehension, appears disproportionate with the wrong. Poets see injustice never where it does not exist — but very often where the unpoetical see no injustice whatever. Thus the poetical irritability has no reference to ‘temper’ in the vulgar sense, but merely to a more than usual clear-sightedness in respect to wrong: — this clear-sightedness being nothing more than a corollary from the vivid perceptions of right — of justice — of proportion. . . But one thing is clear — that the man who is not ‘irritable’ (to the ordinary apprehension), is no poet.” ~Edgar Allan Poe